A Sociological Review on Organizational Strategy andthe Social Structuring of Consumer Dynamics ofInequality in Developing Economies

Main Article Content

Md. Azmir Hossain
Md. Asiqur Rahman
Jamsedur Rahman
Sohag Datta
Md. Motiar Rahman
Md. Shafikul Islam

Abstract

The role of organizational strategy in defining consumer access and exclusion patterns is vital and in most developing economies such decisions only worsen existing inequalities. This is important since the strategic decisions relating to pricing, sustainability, and market positioning can make or break the difference between consumers and non-consumers. Although there has been an increasing body of research on sustainability and corporate strategy, sociological studies have paid little attention to how decisions made by firms structurally produce consumer inequality and the majority of studies have only paid attention to economic consequences but ignored the social processes that define access to goods and services. The study is a qualitative secondary data review based on academic sources, institutional reports, and sociological theories, which synthesize data on organizational influences using thematic analysis. The review demonstrates that social hierarchies are frequently supported by strategic choices and recreate the obstacles to marginalized consumers. The research is valuable in that it incorporates the fields of strategic management and sociology to describe these inequalities.

Article Details

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

A Sociological Review on Organizational Strategy andthe Social Structuring of Consumer Dynamics ofInequality in Developing Economies. (2026). International Journal of Business, Arts and Scientific Study, 7(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.70818/ijbass.2026.v07i01.00102

References

1. Anonymous. (2017). Income inequality and privatization: A multilevel analysis

comparing prefectural size of private sectors in Western China. Journal of

Chinese Sociology. https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/

articles/10.1186/ s40711-017-0055-4

2. Avent-Holt, D., & Shams, S. (2025). Organizations and stratification: Toward a

relational inequality model. In Oxford Handbook of Social Stratification. Oxford

University Press. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/45896/chapter/

537740554

3. Chakrabarti, A. S., Chatterjee, A., Nandi, T. K., Ghosh, A., & Chakraborti, A.

(2016). Quantifying invariant features of within-group inequality in

consumption across groups. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.02463

4. Chatterjee, A., Chakrabarti, A. S., Ghosh, A., Chakraborti, A., & Nandi, T. K.

(2015). Invariant features of spatial inequality in consumption: The case of

India. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04236

5. Fang, C., & Iceland, J. (2018). Housing inequality in urban China: The heritage

of socialist institutional arrangements. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5(1),

12. https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40711

-018-0082-9

6. Frontiers in Sociology. (2023). Retelling social inequalities in the era of market

competition: Review and discussion for sustainable welfare

development. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1085278/full

7. Journal of Chinese Sociology. (2017). Social class differences in consumption

propensity in contemporary China – from survival-oriented consumption to

development-oriented

consumption. https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/articles/10.11

86/s40711-017-0066-1

8. Li, J. (2015). Organization size and economic stratification in urban China:

1996–2006. Journal of Chinese Sociology,

2(17). https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s407

11-015-0019-5

9. Morsy, H., & Shimeles, A. (2023). Structural change and inequality in

Africa. Journal of African Economies, 32(S2), ii228–

ii250. https://academic.oup.com/jae/article/32/Supplement_2/ii228/7118992

10. OECD. (2018). For good measure: Measuring the distribution of household

income, consumption and wealth. OECD

Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/for-good-

measure_9789264307278-en/full-report/component-6.html

11. Study. (2021). Inequality, persistence of the informal economy, and club

convergence. World

Development. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X

20303387

12. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Avent-Holt, D. (2019). Organizational inequality

regimes. Oxford University

Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/5536/chapter/148470748

13. Velandia-Morales, A., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Martínez, R. (2022). Economic

inequality increases the preference for status consumption. Frontiers in

Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809101/full

14. Hossain, M. J. (2025). Impact of Supply Chain Resilience on Operational Performance: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Agility. Pacific Journal of Business Innovation and Strategy, 2(4), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.70818/pjbis.v02i04.0242