A Sociological Review on Organizational Strategy andthe Social Structuring of Consumer Dynamics ofInequality in Developing Economies
Main Article Content
Abstract
The role of organizational strategy in defining consumer access and exclusion patterns is vital and in most developing economies such decisions only worsen existing inequalities. This is important since the strategic decisions relating to pricing, sustainability, and market positioning can make or break the difference between consumers and non-consumers. Although there has been an increasing body of research on sustainability and corporate strategy, sociological studies have paid little attention to how decisions made by firms structurally produce consumer inequality and the majority of studies have only paid attention to economic consequences but ignored the social processes that define access to goods and services. The study is a qualitative secondary data review based on academic sources, institutional reports, and sociological theories, which synthesize data on organizational influences using thematic analysis. The review demonstrates that social hierarchies are frequently supported by strategic choices and recreate the obstacles to marginalized consumers. The research is valuable in that it incorporates the fields of strategic management and sociology to describe these inequalities.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Anyone may copy, distribute, remix, adapt and build upon the work, including for commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
How to Cite
References
1. Anonymous. (2017). Income inequality and privatization: A multilevel analysis
comparing prefectural size of private sectors in Western China. Journal of
Chinese Sociology. https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/
articles/10.1186/ s40711-017-0055-4
2. Avent-Holt, D., & Shams, S. (2025). Organizations and stratification: Toward a
relational inequality model. In Oxford Handbook of Social Stratification. Oxford
University Press. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/45896/chapter/
537740554
3. Chakrabarti, A. S., Chatterjee, A., Nandi, T. K., Ghosh, A., & Chakraborti, A.
(2016). Quantifying invariant features of within-group inequality in
consumption across groups. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.02463
4. Chatterjee, A., Chakrabarti, A. S., Ghosh, A., Chakraborti, A., & Nandi, T. K.
(2015). Invariant features of spatial inequality in consumption: The case of
India. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04236
5. Fang, C., & Iceland, J. (2018). Housing inequality in urban China: The heritage
of socialist institutional arrangements. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5(1),
12. https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40711
-018-0082-9
6. Frontiers in Sociology. (2023). Retelling social inequalities in the era of market
competition: Review and discussion for sustainable welfare
development. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1085278/full
7. Journal of Chinese Sociology. (2017). Social class differences in consumption
propensity in contemporary China – from survival-oriented consumption to
development-oriented
consumption. https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/articles/10.11
86/s40711-017-0066-1
8. Li, J. (2015). Organization size and economic stratification in urban China:
1996–2006. Journal of Chinese Sociology,
2(17). https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s407
11-015-0019-5
9. Morsy, H., & Shimeles, A. (2023). Structural change and inequality in
Africa. Journal of African Economies, 32(S2), ii228–
ii250. https://academic.oup.com/jae/article/32/Supplement_2/ii228/7118992
10. OECD. (2018). For good measure: Measuring the distribution of household
income, consumption and wealth. OECD
Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/for-good-
measure_9789264307278-en/full-report/component-6.html
11. Study. (2021). Inequality, persistence of the informal economy, and club
convergence. World
Development. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X
20303387
12. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Avent-Holt, D. (2019). Organizational inequality
regimes. Oxford University
Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/5536/chapter/148470748
13. Velandia-Morales, A., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Martínez, R. (2022). Economic
inequality increases the preference for status consumption. Frontiers in
Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.809101/full
14. Hossain, M. J. (2025). Impact of Supply Chain Resilience on Operational Performance: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Agility. Pacific Journal of Business Innovation and Strategy, 2(4), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.70818/pjbis.v02i04.0242