Revisiting Leadership in Management: A Structured Reviewof Theories, Practices, and Research Trajectories
Main Article Content
Abstract
Leadership has long been recognized as a central pillar of effective management, yet its meaning, application, and theoretical grounding have continuously evolved in response to changing organizational, technological, and socio-political contexts. In an era marked by digital transformation, global interdependence, sustainability imperatives, and complex governance challenges, revisiting leadership from a structured and integrative perspective has become increasingly important. Contemporary organizations demand leaders who can navigate uncertainty, foster innovation, and balance performance with ethical and social responsibilities. This study aims to revisit and critically synthesize major leadership theories, managerial practices, and emerging research trajectories to provide a comprehensive understanding of how leadership scholarship has progressed and where it is heading. Drawing on an extensive body of peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, and authoritative institutional reports, the study systematically organizes and compares existing literature to identify patterns, shifts, and convergences in leadership thought and practice. Through analytical synthesis, it examines theoretical evolution, practical applications, and conceptual gaps across different periods and contexts. The findings reveal a significant transformation in leadership scholarship. Early trait and behavioral models, which emphasized individual characteristics and styles, gradually gave way to contingency and situational frameworks that acknowledged contextual influences. More recently, leadership discourse has shifted toward relational, ethical, transformational, servant, and sustainable paradigms, reflecting a growing emphasis on shared influence, moral accountability, stakeholder engagement, and long-term organizational resilience. The review also highlights emerging themes such as digital leadership, inclusive leadership, adaptive capacity, and cross-sectoral governance. Despite these advances, notable research gaps persist, particularly in integrating sustainability with performance metrics, contextualizing leadership in the Global South, and bridging theory-practice divides. Academically, this review contributes by consolidating fragmented streams of leadership research into a coherent framework that can guide future inquiry. Practically, it offers managers and policy leaders a structured understanding of evolving leadership models, enabling them to adopt context-sensitive, ethical, and sustainable leadership approaches in complex organizational environments.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Anyone may copy, distribute, remix, adapt and build upon the work, including for commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
How to Cite
References
1. Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (Eds.). (2017). The nature of leadership (3rd ed.).
Sage.
2. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). The full range leadership development:
Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Bass, Avolio &
Associates.
3. Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.). (2013). Transformational and
charismatic leadership: The road ahead (2nd ed.). Emerald Group Publishing.
4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free
Press.
5. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and
educational impact. Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. Sage
Publications.
8. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
9. Day, D. V., & Antonakis, J. (Eds.). (2012). The nature of leadership (2nd ed.).
Sage Publications.
10. Denison, D. R., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. E. (1995). Paradox and
performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial
leadership. Organization Science, 6(5), 524–540.
11. Drucker, P. F. (2001). The essential Drucker: The best sixty years of Peter
Drucker’s essential writings on management. HarperBusiness.
12. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review,
78(2), 78–90.
13. Graeff, C. L. (1997). Evolution of situational leadership theory: A critical
review. Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 153–170.
14. House, R. J. (1971). A path‐goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–339.
15. Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional
leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.
16. Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it
matters. Harvard Business School Press.
17. Kotter, J. P. (1990). What leaders really do. Harvard Business Review, 68(3),
103–111.
18. Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Sage
Publications.
19. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage
Publications.
20. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996).
Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship
behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259–298.
21. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-
Bass.
22. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of
charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4),
577–594.
23. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. Free Press.
24. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership
theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The
Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.
25. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
26. Yukl, G. A. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
27. Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is
essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81–93.
28. Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2009). Are women better leaders than men? Harvard Business Review, 87(2), 80–85.
29. Hossain, M. J. (2025). Impact of Supply Chain Resilience on Operational Performance: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Agility. Pacific Journal of Business Innovation and Strategy, 2(4), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.70818/pjbis.v02i04.0242