Understanding the Impact of Social Networks onConsumer Buying Behavior: A ComprehensiveReview from a Sociological Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social networks both offline and online serve as powerful platforms for the exchange of information, opinions, and cultural norms that shape individual and group purchasing decisions. This review explores how social interactions, peer influence, and digital platforms shape purchasing decisions.With the rise of digital connectivity, consumers are increasingly shaped by interactions within social platforms, peer groups, and online communities. The study synthesizes secondary data to analyze key sociological concepts such as social proof, peer influence, social relationships, and the bandwagon effect. Additionally, the review highlights the role of influencers, user-enerated content, and community engagement in shaping ethical and emotional consumer responses. By integrating sociological theory with marketing practice, the paper offers valuable insights for marketers, sociologists, and businesses aiming to understand and ethically leverage the power of social networks in consumer markets.The review underscores the importance of understanding social dynamics in consumer decision-making processes, offerin valuable insights for marketers, businesses, and researchers aiming to engage effectively with socially connected consumers. Future research directions are proposed to address emerging trends and deepen our understanding of the interplay between social networks and consumption in an increasingly digitized world.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. Anyone may copy, distribute, remix, adapt and build upon the work, including for commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated. License details: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
How to Cite
References
1. Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2012). Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 337(6092), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215842
2. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., &Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
3. Brown, J. J., &Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1086/209118
4. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
5. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
6. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
7. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little, Brown Spark.
8. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and
conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/
annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
9. Efendioğku I. H. (2022), The impact of conspicuous consumption in social Media on purchasing intentions, General Economics (econ.GN), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.12026
10. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
11. Gull, S., &Idrees, H. (2022). Green Training and Organizational Efficiency: Mediating
Role of Green Competencies. European Journal of Training and Development, 46, 105-119.https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2020-0147
12. Katz, E., &Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.
13. Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3
14. Muniz, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer
Research, 27(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1086/319618
15. Nguyen, T. N., Simkin, L., &Canhoto, A. I. (2021). The dark side of digital
personalization: Exploring the commodification of social influence. Journal of Business Research, 136, 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.063
16. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American
community. Simon & Schuster.
17. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without
organizations. Penguin Press.
18. Solomon, M. R. (2020). Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being (13th ed.). Pearson.
19. Wellman, B., &Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Blackwell Publishers.
20. Hossain, M. J. (2024). Digital Supply Chain Adoption and Operational Efficiency in Bangladesh's Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review. Pacific Journal of Business Innovation and Strategy, 1(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.70818/pjbis.v01i01.0240